To revive a previous discussion - the idea of using high-frequency energy (like microwaves) to split water into hydrogen and oxygen for fuel is still being bandied about. There are arguments that "big oil" and "big energy" are suppresssing the technology. A chemist from Australia (John Christie, Faculty, School of Chemistry, La Trobe University, Bundoora) nails the issue when he writes: "The real problem with producing hydrogen from water is not efficiency, but simply the total energy cost. "
Comments:
- Here you go Andy try some Ancient Gravitics
- Or maybe you need some deeper background on Implosion Technology
- Everybody Wing Chun tonight because Robert Patterson reports that "Wing Chun would prove to be an instrumental key in my comprehension of natural and environmental energies." Along with his apprenticeship in HVAC, and his learning "to read blueprints and schematics".
Also drink plenty of water because "The dynamics of flowing, GOOD healthy water is bristling with levitational and healing qualities." And you will learn to fly. Better yet - go ask a porpoise about flying using implosion technology.
- I call this theThe Sky Whale
Post a Comment- Someone has done the theoretical aerodynamic analysis. The constant roller-coastering would turn me green, then orange, then I would jump out, without a parachute. Since we have lightweight composits, and better construction techniques than the Hindenburg, why not it with the propulsion tunnel right down the center axis and with enclosed ducted fans. Two counter-rotating props, with intake at the highest pressure point in the bow, and exhaust at the lowest pressure point in the stern. Actually, if you build it double-ended, it could reverse direction without turning around.